You’ve probably already heard this story 4 or 5 times by the time this article is jazzing up your Facebook wall, but in case you missed it, here’s the bones, it’s very simple:
A BLOKE FROM BUENOS AIRES THOUGHT HE WAS BUYING POODLES BUT THEY WERE ACTUALLY FERRETS ON STEROIDS.
Yes, it’s got that LOL-factor, but that’s the end of the story, there’s not really any more detail. These sorts of stories are like well needed drags on a cigarette for media websites. Basically they get some office chump to pad out a story in a matter of minutes and they’ve got 250 words of “news” content that they can have on the internet immediately.
Because of the headline and the picture they’ll probably get retweets and Facebook shares galore, a web publishers wet dream. BUT the attention is shared quickly between all of the internet lords so the pay back is lessened.
I’m not knocking it, that’s exactly what I’m doing right now. But I thought I would let you know about how the other sites reported it just so you don’t have to read all of the articles like I did… not that you were going to. I find it entertaining because some poor navvy has to make a one sentence story stretch out long enough to ensure people stay on their site to observe their advertising stream (just like I’m doing, but at least I’m admitting it). So here’s the run down:
They admit to robbing a quote from a veterinarian off the Daily Mail - “The veterinarian informed him the ferrets ‘had been given steroids at birth to increase their size and then had some extra grooming to make their coats resemble a fluffy toy poodle'”.
They tell us he paid $150 per poodle.
Yahoo also say that the same man had been tricked into buying a fake chihuahua at the same market. Come on mate…. get a grip.
At this point they have run out of details, so they just copy and paste the Daily Mail’s guide to buying a poodle and not getting duped, which includes the ever so helpful tip to spotting a real poodle: “Toy poodles have been known to live as long as 20 years.” – well I guess I’ll have to wait a while to check it’s the real deal then.
Lastly they include a news clip from Argentina, completely in a foreign language with no subtitles. That’s really helpful…. well padded out.
The Mail Online
These guys go all out with their headline:
“Man gets shock of his life when he buys two toy poodles for $150 only to be told by a vet that they are actually GIANT RODENTS pumped up with steroids to look like dogs”
– Wow, hard hitting journalism guys! I don’t want to be a pedant but ferrets aren’t rodents either. They do give us a bit more detail though: the market is called La Salada and this phenomena is well known over there. They give the ferrets hormones at birth, and they are colloquially known as ‘Brazilian Rats’. So, basically, don’t buy dogs from there you plums?
They go on to pad the article out with a picture of a real dog and a non-hormonal ferret, followed by some unnecessary detail about the market its self. This is finished off with the helpful tips mentioned by Yahoo and the unintelligible foreign news clip.
The Metro, source of journalism par excellence, haven’t really tried, they’ve stuck in some MASSIVE pictures and some responses from the magnificently uninformed world of Twitter. Their bold tag line underneath the title is “The next time you buy a cute poodle make sure you check it isn’t a ferret filled with steroids, like some that were sold in Argentina.” – OK. I will.
This Twitter comment took my eye: @inflatedKarma: ‘If you don’t know the difference between a toy poodle and a ferret on steroids you probably deserve to get ripped off.’ So Mr Inflated Karma, are you saying that if someone has a low IQ they deserve to be diddled out of cash? What if they have learning difficulties? Does that still apply? Mong.
How did they round the story off? The unintelligible news clip of course.
The story has truly gone global. The Ozzies don’t really add to the story, other than to convert the costs in to Australian dollars.
The Huffington Post
Nothing new here, they got the Daily Mail check list and of course, the unintelligible video to close.
These were the poorest coverers by far, one picture and 137 words. No video, no check list for poodle purchasers….. oh well.
Another point to mention is how very quiet the BBC were on this topic?
Now I want to be clear, I’m not dissing these guys, I’ve just done exactly the same thing as them, I’ve made a short but slightly amusing story fill more than 800 words. It’s just taken me longer than them, and people have probably already stopped searching for the images on Google now, so I’ve missed the click boat due to my sarcastic vent. Oh well… now, how shall I end this item? Oh yeah, an unintelligible news report of course: